File #: 2004-0509    Version:
Type: Motion Status: Passed
File created: 10/25/2004 In control: Committee of the Whole
On agenda: Final action: 11/8/2004
Enactment date: Enactment #: 12036
Title: A MOTION expressing the intent of the council to monitor permit efficiency and customer service by the department of development and environmental services and to follow through on recent recommendations from the King County auditor.
Sponsors: Carolyn Edmonds, Julia Patterson, Dow Constantine, Bob Ferguson, Dwight Pelz, Larry Phillips, Larry Gossett, Jane Hague
Indexes: CAO (Critical Areas Ordinances), Council, DDES/DPER, Permits
Attachments: 1. Motion 12036.pdf, 2. Staff Report CAO Companion Motions (11-8-04).doc
Title
A MOTION expressing the intent of the council to monitor permit efficiency and customer service by the department of development and environmental services and to follow through on recent recommendations from the King County auditor.
Body
WHEREAS, during consideration of the ordinances relating to critical areas, stormwater and clearing and grading, the council heard testimony raising concerns about permit costs, particularly for applications triggering hourly fees for review by the department of development and environmental services, and
WHEREAS, a September 28, 2004, report from the King County auditor reviewed the department of development and environmental services' workload and staffing and provided trend data for the average review time per permit and the average number of permits processed per reviewer over the period from 2000 though 2003, and
WHEREAS, in its September 28, 2004, report to the council, the King County auditor recommended that the department of development and environmental services develop performance measures to track permit processing efficiency on a quarterly basis, and
WHEREAS, the council wants to continue to monitor trends for permit processing efficiency following adoption of the critical areas, stormwater and clearing and grading ordinances as a way of informing future council decisions about permit review processes and permit fee structures, and
WHEREAS, the council seeks information on how often "complex" site engineering review is required, triggering the need for hourly review fees, and
WHEREAS, a March 2, 2004, report from the King County auditor reviewed the department of development and environmental services' permitting practices and recommended the use of telephone exit surveys as a tool for monitoring customer satisfaction;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT MOVED by the Council of King County:
A. Through the 2005 budget process, the council will direct the department of development of environmental service...

Click here for full text